
Karen McTier wrote:“Only LEGO, with their expertise in the construction category, is capable of doing justice to the incredibly imaginative environments depicted in the world of THE LORD OF THE RINGS and the two films based on THE HOBBIT"

onions wrote:i'd rather see starcraft make the switch before halo.
Marty wrote:Apart from these, why don't they come up with something new, I wish one of these companies would take up the Battlestar license as it would be a lot more financial, not to mention a better scope for figures as well as ships. But yet again we'll see halo, dora & poo, not-to-mention more super heros to poke a stick at?
We might get good ole lego insted of having to buy megablocks for halo!no military stuff? what about kingdoms, castles , agents, atlantis, city , and other fighting things?Bellicosesaid:
The problem with a Halo/Battlestar/Starcraft license is it diverts from the whole 'no military stuff' thing Lego has had going for ages...

Draykov wrote:- Be sure to check out the various topics in the "Start Here" forum. Particularly the Code of Conduct and How to write posts, make friends, and influence people... 2 threads.
We appreciate your enthusiasm for the brick, but it's also a good idea to get the lay of the land and figure out the general tone and attitude of your fellow members before chiming in on a lot of different topics.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests