Travel the dunes with the LEGO� Star Wars™ Ultimate Collector Series Sancrawler™

FBTB - From Bricks To Bothans

Follow us: RSS
News? Questions? Comments? Email!

Review: 9471 Uruk-Hai Army

The official Lego set review forum. Please read the Guidelines before posting!

Review: 9471 Uruk-Hai Army

Postby Staff » Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:16 pm

Full Set

After reviewing Helm's Deep, I had fully intended to review the small army-builder companion set, Uruk-hai army. Life (and laziness) are kind of funny like that. Since that time, we've gotten a new wave of Hobbit sets, the release of the movie, and renewed focus on the line.

At $30, The Uruk-Hai army is prime army builder fodder. While more expensive than a battle pack, it offers some full set features, and is designed to stick on the side of Helm's Deep. So, does the value really stack up? $30 is the new $20 in the world of LEGO sets. The days of the $10 and $15 fodder sets to build up your collections is, sadly, gone. This price-point is the new low-end builder sets that can beef up your collection and parts. So, if you're one of those people (like me) that always wants to build the full army for Helm's Deep, or perhaps make a diorama of the Emperor's arrival (which I should have bought the UCS shuttle for), it means a lot of money into sets like this.

The set was designed to extend the wall of Helm's Deep, past the explosion section. Theoretically, you could put multiple sections and make a really long, low wall I suppose, but really, this set is more about parts after the first section. Despite the name, we do also get some Rohan in the set, with Éomer, leader of the Rohirrim, and a nameless soldier for the sake of this review, we're going to call Carl.

Eomer Eomer No Helmet

Eomer is a good generic figure (and in the movies, was a good generic character). Also, that face would be perfect for a my personal minifigure. Both the anger and the red beard would fit me well... there's also an alt-face (one I neglected to photograph), but basically just imagine him with a smirk instead of a yell. While he's a named figure, there's nothing about him that makes it all that unique, so take off the cape or make a few small changes and you have another decent army-builder figure.

As a bonus, we do get one of the new horses, which I still like in black more than brown, but I'm starting to come around on it.

Rohan Soldier Soldier Alt-Face

Carl is more of the same, a soldier like we got with Helm's Deep here for the slaughter. What was always odd about these sets is that the soldiers we get are full-on soldiers. Most of the soldiers in the battle, however, were conscripts and leftovers. Give me a little kid in some chain mail or an old guy that's wearing some raggedy leather. That'd fit more in the battle.

In the end, both are capable army-builder type figures that can augment castle and Lord of the Rings stuff alike. What's nice is that you can just swap out the head and hands for yellow and drop these into any castle scene out there. Always nice when the flesh colors aren't printed on the torsos...


For the namesake of the set (though one can debate four being called an army... it's not even a basketball team; it's more like doubles tennis), we have lots of Uruk-hai. Really, it's just the same guy four times, with different combinations of equipment and using the alternate face. These are the same as in Helm's Deep, but this is a more economical way to get them, to be sure. One little quibble... I really wish the halberd was in the metallic grey, same as the rest of the armor and weapons. It just looks odd being dark grey next to the rest.

The Uruk-hai come with a balista, which was used to fire hooks and ropes at the wall. While bigger in the movie, there's only so much you can do  with such a limited part set. But given that these guys are the focus, it would have been nice if more of the set was about them... maybe a climbing ladder or some other war machine.

Side View

The machine itself is quite effective though. I like the use of round tiles instead of bricks for the wheels. That's a lot of utility in parts. All of the tiles on there are printed as well, which is a nice touch. But it really highlights that all of the rest of the LotR and Hobbit sets with wood patterns use stickers...

Here's the really weird thing though. I have a long record of hating flick-fire missiles, yet I like how they were used in this set. If there's a complaint, it's that I would have liked to see a string or something tied to them as a rope, because otherwise there's not much point to the hook. Otherwise, LEGO, after, I don't know, seventeen million tries (or so it seems, these things are everywheres), the made Flick-Fires work in a set.


The bulk of the set though, is tied up in the small wall section to add on to Helm's Deep. It's built in the exact same style as the castle itself, so it looks seamless (though it does need something to connect it when you click it on).


Front to back, it's a good little castle piece. You get some grooved bricks, if you're in to that (personally, I love them), but they're not overused. You also get a lot of other usable pieces for the castle building, and some sand green. The little catapult is small and mostly useless, but what can you do in a $30 set.

In the end, we get some outstanding value in this set. Six figures, all good army builders. This might be the only set I've ever built where I actually approve of flick-fires (though it'd be cool if there was string or something attached to them), and the bricks you get with the wall make for some outstanding castle-building parts.

What I liked

  • Generic figures make for some great army building

  • Printed wood tiles are exceedingly useful in other applications (shame that other sets don't include these)

  • Castle wall section extends Helm's Deep, and also makes for great castle parts

  • Value is one of the best we've had from LEGO in years

What I didn't like

  • Some part colors don't quite match

  • For a set called "Uruk-Hai Army," most of the focus is on the castle part...

Verdict: Buy it. More than once if you want good parts and value

You can get 9471 Uruk-Hai Army at Amazon

Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 8:19 pm

Re: Review: 9471 Uruk-Hai Army

Postby Ultron32 » Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:33 pm

Isn't it $30?
Speaking of flick fires, can someone please tell me why they put thwm on weathertop?
Also, I don't think this is quite as worth it without owning Helm's Deep already.
Thought you'd like this about the Vatican cameos.
Posts: 546
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:47 am

Re: Review: 9471 Uruk-Hai Army

Postby dWhisper » Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:59 pm

Whoops, you're right on the price. I'd apparently looked at a sale price when I was double-checking it the other day.

As for flick-fires... I don't really know why they're on Weathertop. It was something I'd made fun of when I reviewed that set. That being said, I think this set actually has more value than Helm's Deep, and I think you can do more with it.
If the above post didn't offend you, you're probably reading it wrong.
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:56 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Review: 9471 Uruk-Hai Army

Postby lego the hutt » Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:57 pm

It is a good army builder and I really like sets that combine together with other sets giving you a larger display.

My main issue with this set is the size of the ballista compared to the wall. They are way out of proportion. For my personal display I removed some pieces to make the ballista a bit shorter but it still isn't very good size wise. A minifig could stand on top of it and reach the top of the wall.

Maybe I'm more anal than most but the poor scale has always bothered me.
lego the hutt
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:20 pm

Re: Review: 9471 Uruk-Hai Army

Postby Jengafett » Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:34 am

I am probably getting this set for my birthday on the 27th.
This review just makes me want to get it even more!
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 11:51 pm

Re: Review: 9471 Uruk-Hai Army

Postby JamesBenjamin » Tue Jan 22, 2013 5:54 am


I picked up 3 of these and think its a pretty good representation of the whole castle. Here's a pick of the whole thing assembled. I did stick my orc/urakai from the Orc Forge in there and its missing one of the ballistas, but otherwise this is what you get when you buy 1 helms deep and three of the army builder.
We are such stuff as manure is made of, so let's drink up and forget it... -Eugiene O'Neill
Posts: 252
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:14 pm
Location: Northern VA.

Re: Review: 9471 Uruk-Hai Army

Postby Brainslugged » Tue Jan 22, 2013 11:01 am

That's cool seeing the three wall sections with Helms Deep. I also have three walls built (I think TRU had some sort of buy two, get one free thing going on when they first came out which brought them down to slightly below retail), but I just haven't got round to building the castle yet.
Posts: 266
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:41 am

Re: Review: 9471 Uruk-Hai Army

Postby dWhisper » Tue Jan 22, 2013 5:38 pm

When I did the review for Helm's Deep, I'd taken pictures of this set as well, wanting to do them at the same time. In the Flickr set and that review, you can see that I actually had two of these sets tacked on to the side of it (along with a Cave Troll)...


Of course, the problem was that the pictures for Uruk-Hai army were just terrible, and before I could get them retaken, my daughter decided that she wanted to come storming into the world, delaying me retaking them.

My biggest issue with adding multiple sections was that I felt it highlighted how short the keep walls really felt. Yes, Helm's Deep had a long wall section, but it also was about five times taller than any LEGO set would allow you to make for less than UCS prices.
If the above post didn't offend you, you're probably reading it wrong.
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 10:56 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Review: 9471 Uruk-Hai Army

Postby CaptainFordo » Sat Jan 26, 2013 10:59 am

Grr, some of the innaccuracies in the LOTR sets just fill me with rage. A mild rage, sure, but rage all the same :P Like Aragorn's coat being brown instead of a muddy green, Aragorn not being in his Helm's Deep armour for that set, Gimli not having an elven cloak (possibly excluded due to the mass of headpiece, but still. More specifically in this set: Eomer does not wear a cloak, while the generic Rohan soldiers do. The only time he wears one is for Aragorn's coronation (2003 spoilers), it's possible the set designers wanted him to look more impressive, but it's a little irksome. With Aragorn his cloak is kind of meant to represent his trench I think (even though that's printed on already) so it doesn't look too out of place.

Bah, sorry :P Rant over.
Posts: 269
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2012 3:42 am

Return to Reviews

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests