Travel the dunes with the LEGO� Star Wars™ Ultimate Collector Series Sancrawler™

FBTB - From Bricks To Bothans

Follow us: RSS
News? Questions? Comments? Email!

Review: 9492 TIE Fighter

The official Lego set review forum. Please read the Guidelines before posting!

Review: 9492 TIE Fighter

Postby Staff » Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:38 pm

9492 TIE Figher.JPG

If you’ve been collecting LEGO Star Wars since 1999 with any seriousness and/or obsessiveness, then there’s a good chance you have too many TIE Fighters. I’m not saying that’s a bad thing, well, at least not from a certain point of view. You may say to yourself, “No more, please, I’m stuffed. I don’t have the room.” I don’t blame you. It’s only been a couple of years since the last TIE Fighter, the TIE Defender, sat on store shelves (and in some cases, may still), but we’re going on about 7 years since the last honest-to-goodness TIE Fighter, the signature fighter of the Imperial Navy and perhaps one of the most iconic Star Wars starfighters second only to the X-wing. You may be stuffed, you may have no room, but 9492 TIE Fighter may very well be a set you loosen your belt for.
9492 TIE Fighter Box Front.JPG9492 TIE Fighter Box Back.JPG

Ok, enough metaphor. Don’t eat your LEGO, kids. You can eat the box if you like though, since, as many people have pointed out, it’s big enough to feed a family of 4. There is no logical reason for a box this huge. It may convey on a psychological level to consumers that the contents may be worth the MSRP of $54.99 (or CA$69.99, £49.99, €49.99). It may help illustrate to those of us who have too many TIE Fighters that this is bigger and better than the last version, which retailed for $19.99. Maybe LEGO wanted to show consumers the TIE Fighter’s actual size on the box. It’s very close. It’s also very unnecessary.
9492 TIE Fighter Front.JPG9492 TIE Fighter Rear.JPG

It’s not like anyone’s going to swoosh the box around making sorry imitations of the TIE Fighter whine, right? Of course not. They’re going to open it, build it, and then swoosh it around the house, making sorry imitations of the TIE Fighter whine.
9492 Instructional Error.JPG

Well, let’s back up for a second before we take this out of the hanger bay. Before any sort of swooshing commences, they, you, or anyone, are not going to follow the directions on page 18. Doing so would absolutely tarnish theirs, or your, reputation in the community. I’m sure this has been caught by now and will be fixed in future copies down the line, but it through me off when I found. I questioned my knowledge of the TIE Fighter. I had to look it up to confirm my suspicions. I could have looked on the box, but who was I supposed to trust?
9492 & 7146.JPG9492 & 7146 Again.JPG

Outside of that one little bump in the road, this set has a lot going for it. For one, as you’ve probably noticed, it’s one good looking hunk of plastic. In terms of remakes and rehashes, 7658 Y-wing Fighter has been one of the gold standards in the sheer contrast between original and remake. 9492 comes very close to setting a new standard. It’s almost something you’d find on a talented builder’s Flickr or MOCpage.
9492 Cockpit Detail.JPG

Almost. It’s most glaring shortcoming is in the “ball” cockpit. It’s better than all of the previous versions’ cockpits, but it doesn’t quite advance itself enough to be significantly better. The biggest change is obviously the canopy, which finally ditches the cumbersome old mold in favor of a dome. This helps shape the “ball” better than the previous piece, but the construction around it flat out looks awkward. From a distance, it’s hard to notice this awkwardness, but get close and the slopes are out of place.
9492 Cockpit Interior.JPG

And what's the deal with these red grille "control panels?" There are multiple sets that use the grilles in this manner and I don't get it. Put in the printed control panels, LEGO. Everyone loves those.
9492 Pylon Detail.JPG

This awkwardness extends to the pylons connecting the body to the wings. As a result, they look bulky. It’s not terrible by any means and it does allow for significant support for the wings, but aesthetically it takes away from the overall model.
9492 Cross Section.JPG

I can understand the dilemma, though. With greater accuracy generally comes more pieces and more pieces comes more cost for the consumer. I’ll give the designer(s) credit. At least they tried on this one and we’re finally past the days of what passed for ball cockpits on the previous iterations.
9492 Rear Detail.JPG

The other shortcoming, which is much less noticeable, are the “Twin Ion Engines” in the rear. They’re basically the same as before, only positioned better. I wasn’t a fan of them then, and I’m not now. I know the engines are supposed to be tiny, but this would have been the perfect opportunity to use some of those new round tiles (facing outward, rather than integrated). This is an easy fix, but more accurate engines should have been there from the beginning. If you’re going to put in the effort for accuracy, why not?
9492 TIE Fighter Side.JPG

The highlight of this model is undoubtedly the wings and deservedly so. They were a repetitive, yet quick build, but they come out looking fantastic. For one, they aren’t wobbly, and two, the grey border is makes this model pop. They certainly take cues from fan builders and it’s about time. They may need further reinforcement, however. Some of the large black plates aren’t as secure as they should be and during play there is a good chance they may pop out. It’s another easy fix, but a potential concern nevertheless. What isn't an easy fix is the gap you see between the grey and the black. I don't believe there is much that can be done about it. It's unsightly, but only visible when at the angle the picture was taken.
9492 Cockpit Open.JPG

On a side note, I’m hoping LEGO has more TIEs in development that match this style. We’re about due for a TIE Bomber, aren’t we? And another TIE Interceptor? Yes, I think we are and if they manage to look this good, I’ll be very willing to gorge myself.
9492 Printed Detail.JPG

And look, LEGO was kind enough to print this round tile. Why couldn’t you have done the same on the 9493 X-wing Starfighter as well, huh?
9492 Minifigures.JPG

Complementing the TIE Fighter are 4 minifigures, two of which are unique to this set. There wasn’t any reason to include any minifigures other than the TIE pilot, but I’m not complaining. These minifigures are wonderful. If you’re someone who bases their LEGO Star Wars purchases on the minifigures (I’m not judging), this set doesn’t disappoint.
9492 Minifigures Back.JPG

9492 R5-J2 Dome.JPG9492 Death Star Trooper.JPG9492 Helmet Detail.JPG9492 TIE Pilot Detail.JPG

R5-J2 debuts the new R5 dome mold in black and the Death Star Trooper debuts a new helmet mold (which doubles as a colander for when he needs to rinse vegetables). The Death Star Trooper also sports a double-sided head for those sunny days. The other two figures are your standard issue officers. Note the TIE pilot has the same printed face as those found on the stormtroopers from this product wave.
9492 TIE Fighter Top.JPG9492 TIE Fighter Underside.JPG

+Superior TIE Fighter design, a major leap from previous version.
+Simple enough build for kids, interesting enough for adults.
+Stable wings and solid pylons. Can be displayed or swooshed without worry.
+Excellent assortment of minifigures.
+No stickers

-On the expensive side, at about 13 cents per piece. Ultimately doesn’t feel like a $55 set. It is more substantial than the overpriced 8087 TIE Defender, however.
-Though improved, the “ball” cockpit still doesn’t quite capture the accurate TIE look.
-If played with, the large black plates making up the interior of the wings may need additional reinforcement.
-Overly large box. Not a detriment to the set, simply wasteful and unnecessary.

If the opening paragraph of this review doesn’t apply to you and you don’t have many or any LEGO TIE Fighters, this is one set you don’t want to pass up. If you already do, well, it’s time to make room. It’s worth it to do a little looking and find it under MSRP, which, in my experience was a simple task. 9492 TIE Fighter puts all TIE Fighters before it to shame, and that includes the variants, such as Darth Vader’s TIE Fighter and the TIE Defender. This is the definitive LEGO TIE Fighter and deserving of being in any collection, big, small, or not yet in existence.

Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 8:19 pm

Re: Review: 9492 TIE Fighter

Postby josh.vince » Sat Feb 04, 2012 5:04 pm

ok, with the understanding that this question will apparently tarnish my reputation... what is the problem with page 18?
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 5:03 pm

Re: Review: 9492 TIE Fighter

Postby lowlead » Mon Feb 06, 2012 12:39 pm

Ok, enough metaphor. Don’t eat your LEGO, kids. You can eat the box if you like though, since, as many people have pointed out, it’s big enough to feed a family of 4. There is no logical reason for a box this huge.

Ha! Yup, I did a double take when I first saw these on a shelf...can't miss 'em!

A brand new TIE, X, and Y all in one wave! What's not to love?? As in my other comment for 9493, there's very little to dislike about the new TIE (price aside). Again, the new building techniques really shine here - perfect hex panels with a nice border, very little wobbling, no stickers, love the figs, and a good bet that a like-designed Bomber will follow! This is no TIE Defender, it's one of the 'big three' movie fighters, and I would really like multiple copies. Easier said than done at $55 bucks, but still worth it IMHO.
Posts: 183
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: Downeast

Re: Review: 9492 TIE Fighter

Postby cas » Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:08 pm

josh.vince wrote:ok, with the understanding that this question will apparently tarnish my reputation... what is the problem with page 18?

The top "hatch" is reversed, the black lines should be facing the back. I'm just poking a little fun, don't worry about your reputation. ;)
Staff Writer
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 4:58 pm
Location: ID

Re: Review: 9492 TIE Fighter

Postby nyjpapi » Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:40 pm

Amazon currently has it marked down to $41.49 with free shipping.

Link: ... B005VPRG10
Posts: 45
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Review: 9492 TIE Fighter

Postby Flynn » Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:55 pm

One problem I have with this (and the previous greyed fighter, the Vader's TIE Advanced from a couple years back) is the amount of dark grey they put into the body, making it look a lot messier and less streamlined than it otherwise would. I think if they reduced the dark grey to one or two pieces (or even removed it entirely), the look of the cockpit would be much improved.
joecrowaz on Flickr wrote:Flynn you little wussy with a purple robed fairy for an icon,

Flickr Brickshelf
Posts: 804
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 11:38 am

Re: Review: 9492 TIE Fighter

Postby minimitch » Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:45 pm

Awesome tip!
I'm running out of storage space.
Last edited by minimitch on Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2011 12:38 am

Re: Review: 9492 TIE Fighter

Postby Boyfromvalley » Sat Feb 18, 2012 2:36 pm

I can't believe though I have not picked up one of these or the Y-Wing yet. Instead I've gone and bought another Battle of Endor set; price £55. Not just to get a second AT-ST and a few more Rebel and Ewok figures, but also because I needed the bricks from the bunker for two Mocs I'm working on.

And then instead of getting it again I went and bought the Character Building H.M. Armed forces Challenger 2 tank and Type 40 Navy Destroyer all because Argos had a sale on and I got the two for the price I would have spent on the TIE Fighter.
Posts: 151
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 4:21 pm

Re: Review: 9492 TIE Fighter

Postby MrCRskater » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:07 pm

Mine came in the mail this week, nabbed it at a bargain price of just $35. This is my first TIE/ln, and a very strong showing. The model uses some pretty nifty building techniques (like the hidden technic arms for stabilizing the wing pylons), figs are outstanding, and irresistibly swooshable. $55 is a little steep, but totally worth $50 in my book. Can't wait to build the Y-wing to pair it with.
Staff Writer
Posts: 677
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:44 am

Re: Review: 9492 TIE Fighter

Postby emmtwosix » Wed Feb 22, 2012 1:33 pm

Cas, I see the R5 head pictured in the review has the same problem I noticed on mine: the silver line around the top of the head is very uneven and, well, splotchy. Kinda considered seeing if LEGO would replace this, but it looks like they had an issue with the printing being misaligned or something for this run. This isn't the first time I've received a misprinted part in a set. My new Luminara has a chin that isn't quite centered on her face, but I just decided to live with it.

Good review though! I agree, this is as close to a "must-have" as they've made in a while.
Posts: 130
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 9:22 am
Location: Center of the continental United States

Return to Reviews

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests