

onions wrote:i still don't understand this fascination with the boxes. i suppose it's just one of things that people collect that i'll never 'get'.
onions wrote:first world problems. i think the box condition would only matter if you were going to speculate and sit on it and resell it later, or if it was a gift for a loved one, or if you're one of those weirdos that saves boxes. rip her open and build the set. you'll feel much better when it's on your shelf.
Solo wrote:But the item he paid for probably did arrive in pristine condition. He never bothered to actually open it to confirm. After Lego received the original item and sent a replacement only to get the same complaint again I can understand why they are unwilling to go for round 3. The fact is packaging is designed to protect products from damage by absorbing the damage itself. Expecting a flawless box is an assumption on the buyers end and is not guaranteed or even implied by Lego in any way on their website as far as I've seen. Now, if you were to order it elsewhere and pay a premium for a collectors grade box (I know BBTS has something like that, not sure if it applies to Lego sets though) and it arrived in that condition, then I would consider this is a valid complaint. But Shop at Home clearly does not cater to box collectors.
onions wrote:i still don't understand this fascination with the boxes. i suppose it's just one of things that people collect that i'll never 'get'.
Mofo Jones wrote:OP lost me when he insulted my home state.

Users browsing this forum: cas and 8 guests