Jetrooper wrote:Hey, copyright, what's your gamertag? The one you gave us doesn't exist.
Firespray wrote:Jetrooper wrote:Hey, copyright, what's your gamertag? The one you gave us doesn't exist.
shoggoth666 wrote:I'm still dumbfounded as to why Lego didn't snag the Halo license. Maybe they will, after all they got the POTC and MB had it initially.
Master Beef wrote:LEGO's answer to anyone who asked if they could start a Halo line would PROBABLY be sort of like this:
The Halo franchise has questionable content not suitable for the majority of LEGO's targeted age group (6-11). Although we understand there is a very large fan base, we feel that a LEGO Halo line would go against our core beliefs...
Understandable. But what really bugs me is the fact that LEGO has already produced models from movies that have content just as "unsuitable" as Halo. For example: Indiana Jones has some pretty gory scenes and just about every "expletive" found in Halo is just as common in Indy. Anyone agree/disagree?
Users browsing this forum: MSNbot Media, Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest