Rook wrote:Ah! Zhouston, I am so glad I don't have to face your Niobrara Shaar & Arkose VII! Our two ships are so similar in quality and design. I think you have better techniques but I think mine looks more agressive. It would have been a nasty head to head fight. We might still have to face each other but if we're that lucky to make it to the top four I think we'll both be ok losing to the other.
ImpendingDoom wrote:Even though this setup isn't entirely true to sports brackets, I really don't think it matters how the brackets break down. Either your going against the "best" ship or your facing the ship that beat the "best". Point is your facing everyone directly or indirectly. Good luck to all.
captain sambuca wrote:in this present model though, the resuts simply recreate the earlier round of voting: we know already how the community feels about each ship, about which is the most popular. as such, the 32 into 16 round becomes a bit redundant... we end up with the top 16 ships
i still think a better system would be to have the community vote on just one aspect of the build at each stage. in this case, it could mean voting on the best bounty hunter. the best ship. the best prisoner hold. with ongoing tallies of votes accrued
and that's when it could get interesting. you boys could throw in other rounds to really test the builders. "now make it be able to hold two prisoners", "now make it be able to house a speeder bike", "now make it with landing gear", "now tell us that backstory" or whatever
Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot], Google [Bot] and 2 guests