KimT wrote:Why does some members seem so keen on making this diorama look bad?
Does it really matter that someone did it better or even larger?
I think this is a nice diorama and a great piece of work - I know I'd never have the bricks nor the space to do something like this.
Why not just look at this in a positive manner, instead of looking for flaws and errors?
ItsTwentyBelow wrote:While I like this whole setup with the motorized speeders and the textured snowfield, the whole thing is killed once you see those sickly motorized AT-ATs attempting to lurch across the table. Seriously, what a horrendous set that is If he's going to use official sets, I would have invested in a couple 4483 AT-ATs rather than four of the atrocious motorized ones. It actually looks like a sick camel crawling at you. Other than the four legs it looks nothing like an AT-AT should. But still nice work on the diorama!
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Exabot [Bot] and 6 guests