Solo wrote:This seems unnecessary... but I'm sure it will sell.
I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest if they continued this trend.Turkguy19 wrote:Did anyone say it will destroy the LEGO company? No. I said it was a lame idea and that LEGO needs to stick to the brick rather then video games.
Cool your jets.
!I will definitely... NOT be getting this, first off

onions wrote:oh wait i think i read that wrong. you mean musical instrument elements don't you?

Turkguy19 wrote:Unlike the optimistic ones above me, I think this is a rather dumb idea. I really see no need for having a LEGO version of Rockband, especially when it's the same game, just with LEGO characters. LEGO is really going away from their roots, and really, I have a feeling it's gonna turn out bad if they continue down this path.

I really see no need for having a LEGO version of Rockband, especially when it's the same game, just with LEGO characters.
Turkguy19 wrote:What is so hard to understand what getting away from their roots means? LEGO started as a building toy, not a video game company.
joecrowaz on Flickr wrote:Flynn you little wussy with a purple robed fairy for an icon,
Chief wrote:I think FBTB should abandon its Star Wars roots and cover a different theme.

CaptainPike wrote:For something they claim not to be interested in, there sure have been alot of people comment on this thread. Some one them have come back 2 or 3 time to say they are not interested. What's up with that?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 8 guests