
onions wrote:not a big loss. market street sucked anyway. good riddance.
onions wrote:not a big loss. market street sucked anyway. good riddance.
Thats what I love about onions.... not afraid to voice his opinion. hmmm....still
Anyhoo... I kind of agree with both comments on this one, the right half of Market St is awesome, but the left half really sux. Even though, I have still bought all the Modular sets, and will continue to (mainly for my son to have an enormous city in the 'lego room', but this unforunately is one that will definately be substantially modded, mainly to heavily upgrade the 'market', rather than a large empty baseplate with some doohicky infrastructure,... into an actual bustling market place. They should have put more effort into that section and charged more. But then again, maybe they were trying to get a lower price point to attract the 'less cashed up client.' Bah humbug.
onions wrote:if i had a 160 bucks and had a choice between getting the ugly market street, a first or second cafe corner, or a first or second or third green grocer, i'd be getting one of the other ones in a heartbeat. medieval market village is also leagues better than market street.
the problem for market street is that there is no unifying architectural design through the building. rather than look like an actual building from top to bottom, it looks like a mish mash of different design approaches all jammed into one. the rotating roof? why in god's name would they include a roof that rotates to other designs that are just as ugly?

onions wrote:if i had a 160 bucks and had a choice between getting the ugly market street, a first or second cafe corner, or a first or second or third green grocer, i'd be getting one of the other ones in a heartbeat. medieval market village is also leagues better than market street.
onions wrote:if i had a 160 bucks and had a choice between getting the ugly market street, a first or second cafe corner, or a first or second or third green grocer, i'd be getting one of the other ones in a heartbeat. medieval market village is also leagues better than market street.
the problem for market street is that there is no unifying architectural design through the building. rather than look like an actual building from top to bottom, it looks like a mish mash of different design approaches all jammed into one. the rotating roof? why in god's name would they include a roof that rotates to other designs that are just as ugly?
rocksteady wrote:I'm just curious why is you can call such a set ugly, when this set is sold-out of sometime.
rocksteady wrote: I've been in many lego stores, and Lego Marketstreet has been always on demand or sold out in local stores. For the cost of it, the architectural design shouldn't be such an issue...you can customize it with additional pieces if you really wanted too. You really get what you pay for (not as expensive as GG or CC).
So everyone doesn't have onion taste like you do, no reason to call this an ugly set. Like many others, I bought this set and have no regrets.

rocksteady wrote:I'm just curious why is you can call such a set ugly, when this set is sold-out of sometime. I've been in many lego stores, and Lego Marketstreet has been always on demand or sold out in local stores. For the cost of it, the architectural design shouldn't be such an issue...you can customize it with additional pieces if you really wanted too. You really get what you pay for (not as expensive as GG or CC).
So everyone doesn't have onion taste like you do, no reason to call this an ugly set. Like many others, I bought this set and have no regrets.

ccjwprongs wrote:Wow, you people have surprised me. I didn't think Market Street was that universally disliked. Sure, it doesn't live up to the majesty of Green Grocer or Cafe Corner, but it's still a great set IMO. Love all the blue.
Solo wrote:What? Personal opinion is a perfect reason to call a set ugly. You crazy.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests