Solo wrote:I doubt it would be broken for a single user on a single section, there's probably one thread in there you haven't read. Possibly on the second page where it's less obvious.
5. One account per person.
Creating multiple accounts, for any reason, is grounds for an immediate ban. If you have any problems logging into your account, contact the staff.
Jedd the Jedi wrote:Personally, I think the change of mood is welcome, the previous forums seemed like a fertile stomping ground for spammers and little kids. However, I think the reins should be slackened a little bit. I know Don and the rest of the administrative/moderation team want to maintain some order, but that doesn't mean you have to stamp out all the fun. I apologise for my mistakes on the forum, but Don's explanation sounded like something a strict teacher might say rather than the words of a moderator of a forum about Star Wars LEGO.
Solo wrote:I'm not sure I know what specifically you're referring to... how I've been replying here, or how I was there?
The Review Forum wrote:...1 thread per set (further reviews should just go in the same forum)...
Jedd the Jedi wrote:Personally I think everyone has been putting on their starched shirts while browsing the forums. It just doesn't feel as fun or as community-based as the old forums, even though many members are returning. Either that or it could just take some time.
Jedd the Jedi wrote:Also, the gleeful thread-locking was less rampant in the old forums.
Jedd the Jedi wrote:The "death of the catch-all threads" is a little awkward, even though I know the intention is good. Many of those threads were fairly useful, particularly the Movie Goodness thread, and one thread on a single movie might not last all that long.
Master Fetty wrote:Am I the only one who thinks the Set Review description is too long? I know its so that everyone understands the rules, but no one really reads them anyway. It just makes the site look less organised than it should.
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 2 guests